I came across a nice series of posts on LSAT Logical Reasoning written by Stuart Kovinsky – a very experienced LSAT teacher. Thought I would share them with you in one post.
RT @KaplanLSATPrep Common LSAT logical flaws – Part 1 http://t.co/DxisxXdYzC #LSAT #LSAT #prelaw – Correlation does not mean causation
— LSAT PREParation (@LSATPreparation) March 7, 2013
RT @KaplanLSATPrep Common LSAT Logical Flaws Part 2 http://t.co/OLVaxT3Oqr #prelaw – Conditional reasoning = basic #LSAT reasoning skill
— LSAT PREParation (@LSATPreparation) March 16, 2013
RT @KaplanLSATPrep Common Logical Flaws – Part 3 http://t.co/6lHONCBjZx #LogicGames #LogicReasoningSection #LSAT #prelaw – "Scope" issues
— LSAT PREParation (@LSATPreparation) March 16, 2013
You should read these posts to gauge your progress in your LSAT prep. If you don’t understand them you are probably NOT ready to take the LSAT. If you do understand these posts then you may be ready to take the LSAT.
Therefore, an understanding of these posts is a (choose choice A or B) condition for being ready to take the LSAT.
A: Necessary
B: Sufficient
The correct answer is A – Necessary.